I am ever more interested in different perspectives, and this commentor provides such a perspective.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
December 10, 2009 at 8:44 pm
Thank you, thank you, thank you, for this site. Common sense is finally starting to break out.
I would like to step away form CO2 for a minute and make a few quick comments:-
1. The sun (Sol) is a 1% variable star with cycle of 100 years this means that the Earth’s temperature has to vary by 3K or 3 degrees centigrade over past 100 years.
2. The Earth’s axis precess around the galactic plane about 24500 Years.
3. So too does the major axis of the the Earth’s orbit around Sol (4 hours per year).
4. Sol has an 11 year Sun spot cycle.
All of these effect Global climate.
1. The sun (Sol) is a 1% variable star with cycle of 100 years this means that the Earth’s temperature has to vary by 3K or 3 degrees centigrade over past 100 years.
2. The Earth’s axis precess around the galactic plane about 24500 Years.
3. So too does the major axis of the the Earth’s orbit around Sol (4 hours per year).
4. Sol has an 11 year Sun spot cycle.
All of these effect Global climate.
As for Global warming:-
1. The so called increase is between .3 and .7 degrees centigrade, but the instrument only has a resolution of 1 degree, which means the measurement can only be stated at + or – 1 degree centigrade, this places global warming in the noise band of the instrument. (Why is it that none of the published data show error bands on the data)
2. if you preform a Fast Fourier Transform on the data (I have) the result is an even distribution of frequencies and amplitudes which means the data is noise.
1. The so called increase is between .3 and .7 degrees centigrade, but the instrument only has a resolution of 1 degree, which means the measurement can only be stated at + or – 1 degree centigrade, this places global warming in the noise band of the instrument. (Why is it that none of the published data show error bands on the data)
2. if you preform a Fast Fourier Transform on the data (I have) the result is an even distribution of frequencies and amplitudes which means the data is noise.
According to Albert Miller and Jack C. Thompson, Elements of Meteorology p.7
there is 2300 billion tons of CO2 in the atmosphere which represents about 0.32% and we produce about 6 billion tons per year which is 0.26% of that or 0.0008% of the total atmosphere.
there is 2300 billion tons of CO2 in the atmosphere which represents about 0.32% and we produce about 6 billion tons per year which is 0.26% of that or 0.0008% of the total atmosphere.
Perhaps we can save the planet by buying each “greenie” a pocket calculator and teaching them how to use it!!
Richard said,